The capital structure of a business is among the key decision-making points along side investment decisions and distribution decisions.

The administrative centre structure shows how much financial leverage a company is wearing its books in terms of other capital such as for example equity. Potential investors look at the capital structure and identify the total amount of debt raised by the company and also this helps them to evaluate the risk of financial distress. A risk that is high of distress is connected with bankruptcy. Yet, having debt that is too little the books can prevent the organization from checking up on the industry growth rates. Therefore, it is important to understand the important elements for the capital structure as well as its influence on company value (Chowdhury and Chowdhury, 2010).

Companies have now been participating in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) for several decades. In reality, this has been one of the major modes of growth for companies operating in saturated markets. It is a way that is simple boost a company’s sales, enter an innovative new market or increase efficiency through synergy. However, M&A are not successful in each and every case. There were instances that are many a merger or an acquisition proved to be a value destructor rather than a value creator. Therefore, it is vital to investigate whether M&A activity actually creates value or not (Zollo and Meier, 2008).

Finance literature has two different views on the dividend policy. One view suggests that dividends are irrelevant for value whereas the other view states that dividends have implications for value. The theory that is original of of dividends for value was empirically tested by DeAngelo and DeAngelo (2006) additionally the authors rejected the model that has been suggested by Miller and Modigliani (1961). The study demonstrated that the payout policy was relevant and investment policy was not the only determinant of firm value. The observations were inherent even to markets that are frictionless. However, the study paid attention to total payouts rather than cash dividends only. Thereby, no distinction was made between distributing earnings to shareholders in the shape of dividends or stock repurchases (Handley, 2008).

To view the full essay click here

The Mean-Variance approach is a very common portfolio optimisation method which can be based on the assumption that most investors make rational investment decisions if they are given use of complete market information. Having said that, the Black-Litterman model is a more advanced method of portfolio optimisation. The reason that is primary developing this model was so it aimed to overcome fundamental issues such as errors in estimation, portfolios that are too concentrated, and technical issues such as for instance input sensitivity. The 2 approaches have their strengths that are own weaknesses (Idzorek, 2007). This paper is designed to discuss these features and then make a comparison which can be of value to investors.

You can find an estimated 6.5 million adults in the UK alone who are classified as carers (Carers UK, 2015) , with rates likely to rise to 9 million individuals by 2037 (Ibid.). Carers are individuals who take on the day to day support needs of household members who will be suffering from chronic physical or health that is mental (Baguley and Sprung, 2017), and are usually considered to save the economy around Ј132 billion on a yearly basis, equating to an average of Ј19,336 per year, per carer (Carers UK, 2015). Whereas approximately 3 million carers employment that is combine providing care, Care UK (2015) estimate that 20% of carers are forced to abandon work altogether due to the high demands added to them, both physically and emotionally. The provision of long haul caregiving has been linked to increased health conditions (Wolff et al., 2016), increased social isolation (Hayes et al., 2015) and decreased quality of life (Jeong et al., 2015).

Contemporary nursing practice is a varied and field that is challenging nurses are increasingly associated with complex decision-making as their roles expand into the health system (Cherry and Jacob, 2016). Underlying any care decision is the have to identify the origin associated with problem and then to build up a suitable way of addressing this problem. To assist in decision-making, it is strongly recommended that nurses adopt frameworks or types of care and problem-solving planning (Johansen and O’Brien, 2016). The assessment, planning, implementing and evaluating approach, also referred to as APIE (Yura and Walsh, 1967), is a commonly used approach to care planning in nursing practice. This method encourages a systematic and rigorous method of patient care, incorporating a holistic perspective of the care process. The purpose of this paper will be assess the individual components of the APIE while the approach in respect to nursing practice to its entirety.

Compiled by Raymond H.

To view the full essay click here

The acronym ‘ADPIE’ – which stands for assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation – is employed in the field of nursing to aid guide the process that is proper of provision for patients (Bernard, 2018). This technique can be utilized in a choice of physical or psychological state settings, and follows the same process regardless of what branch of medicine clinicians are working in (Ibid.). This essay will introduce Jerry, a patient with possible alcohol issues, who is a 68 year man that is old drinking is now concerning to his friends and family, and whose memory has been reported to be getting rapidly worse. It really is of note here that based on the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s Code (NMC, 2015), ‘Jerry’ is a pseudonym to maintain patient confidentiality, with no other personally identifiable information shall be found in this essay. So that you can demonstrate the ADPIE process, each stage will probably be outlined below; decisions and actions will be supported both by clinical guidelines and by peer reviewed evidence was relevant.

Published by John C.

To look at the full essay click here

The past few decades have observed a growing interest that is public the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Despite a attitude that is generally positive relation to its use and safety, concerns do remain concerning the effectiveness among these therapies (Barnes et al., 2004). Despite the expansion regarding the scientific knowledge base of Western medicine, the global rise in popularity of CAM therapies has seen a dramatic increase over recent years; a steady increase in the lifetime prevalence among these therapies are also reported in developed countries (Kessler et al., 2001). Research groups have suggested several determinants that will determine this CAM that is increased- included in these are those of geographical, cultural, socio-economic, and physical contexts (Shaikh & Hatcher, 2007). The geographical determinant has, by far, been the absolute most accepted amongst these- several developing countries have now been observed to make use of CAM therapy as basic treatment line (Tan et al., 2004). However, the prevalence of this does further vary between urban and rural areas within these countries. Nevertheless, even countries with national insurance systems have seen an increase in the use that is public’s acceptance of CAM- where these therapies aren’t covered by insurance; thus suggesting that these therapies might have benefits that outweigh their costs (Frass et al., 2012). Despite these increased usage patterns, the clinical effectiveness among these therapies seem debatable- with CAM professionals themselves leaning towards the dependence on a “more scientific” testing prior to the use of these therapies (Raza et al., 2018). This paper aims to assess the effectiveness of alternative treatment within the treatment of common illnesses.

Evidence-based practice is a cornerstone of contemporary medical and nursing care (Aveyard & Sharp, 2013) and may be looked at the standard that is gold to care. The tenet that is central of practice is that a goal appraisal of published literature enables you to isolate the top interventions, which may then be reproduced in practice, while considering use a weblink the preferences and considerations associated with patient (Hamer & Collinson, 2014). The nurse that is individual accountable for making certain they adopt an evidence-based approach to care, appraising research highly relevant to their professional duties and responsibilities (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2011). As such, critiquing is a key skill that should really be developed and practised by all nurses and healthcare professionals alike.

The non-public, Cultural, and Structural Analysis (PCS) model explains how power relationships are expressed between individuals, groups, and in the wider society. The PCS model also highlights the effect that is layered of on individuals (Pepper, 2012). The model was initially proposed by Neil Thompson in his book ‘Anti-Discriminatory Practice: Equality, Diversity and Social Justice’. It is known to have three level that is interrelated as personal, cultural, and structural (Thompson, 2012).

In line with the PCS model, the workings of oppression can be analysed through these known levels, that are elucidated in detail below.